Genetic insights into the 'sandwich fusion' subtype of Klippel-Feil syndrome: novel FGFR2 mutations identified by 21 cases of whole-exome sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) is a rare congenital disorder characterized by the fusion of two or more cervical vertebrae during early prenatal development. This fusion results from a failure of segmentation during the first trimester. Although six genes have previously been associated with KFS, they account for only a small proportion of cases. Among the distinct subtypes of KFS, "sandwich fusion" involving concurrent fusion of C0-1 and C2-3 vertebrae is particularly noteworthy due to its heightened risk for atlantoaxial dislocation. In this study, we aimed to investigate novel candidate mutations in patients with "sandwich fusion." METHODS: We collected and analyzed clinical data from 21 patients diagnosed with "sandwich fusion." Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed, followed by rigorous bioinformatics analyses. Our focus was on the six known KFS-related genes (GDF3, GDF6, MEOX1, PAX1, RIPPLY2, and MYO18). Suspicious mutations were subsequently validated through in vitro experiments. RESULTS: Our investigation revealed two novel exonic mutations in the FGFR2 gene, which had not previously been associated with KFS. Notably, the c.1750A > G variant in Exon 13 of FGFR2 was situated within the tyrosine kinase domain of the protein, in close proximity to several established post-translational modification sites. In vitro experiments demonstrated that this certain mutation significantly impacted the function of FGFR2. Furthermore, we identified four heterozygous candidate variants in two genes (PAX1 and MYO18B) in two patients, with three of these variants predicted to have potential clinical significance directly linked to KFS. CONCLUSIONS: This study encompassed the largest cohort of patients with the unique "sandwich fusion" subtype of KFS and employed WES to explore candidate mutations associated with this condition. Our findings unveiled novel variants in PAX1, MYO18B, and FGFR2 as potential risk mutations specific to this subtype of KFS.

Clinical and Surgical Characteristics of Patients with Atlantoaxial Dislocation in the Setting of Sandwich Fusion: A Case-Control Analysis of Over 500 Patients with Mid-Term to Long-Term Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Patients with "sandwich" fusion (concomitant C1 occipitalization and C2-C3 nonsegmentation), a subtype of Klippel-Feil syndrome, are at particular risk for developing atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). However, the clinical and surgical characteristics of AAD in patients with sandwich fusion have not been clearly defined. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study with a large sample size and a minimum 2-year follow-up was performed. From 2000 to 2018, 253 patients with sandwich AAD underwent a surgical procedure; these patients constituted the case group, and a matching number of patients with non-sandwich AAD were randomly selected to form the control group. Clinical data from electronic medical records and various imaging studies were analyzed and compared. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale was used to evaluate neurological function. RESULTS: Patients with sandwich AAD, compared with patients with non-sandwich AAD, had symptom onset at a younger age (34.8 compared with 42.8 years; p < 0.001) and had a higher likelihood for myelopathy (87.4% compared with 74.7%; p < 0.001). Patients with sandwich AAD had a higher incidence of lower cranial nerve palsy (7.9% compared with 0.0%; p < 0.001), a lower preoperative JOA score (13.4 compared with 14.2; p < 0.001), and higher incidences of accompanying Type-I Chiari malformation (20.9% compared with 1.2%; p < 0.001) and syringomyelia (21.3% compared with 1.6%; p < 0.001). Finally, patients with sandwich AAD had higher likelihoods of undergoing transoral release (28.5% compared with 5.1%; p < 0.001) and use of salvage fixation techniques (34.4% compared with 6.3%; p < 0.001), and had lower postoperative results for the JOA score (14.9 compared with 15.9; p < 0.001) and improvement rate (43.8% compared with 58.2%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with sandwich AAD demonstrated distinct clinical manifestations. Versatility involving the use of various internal fixation techniques and transoral release procedures was frequently required in the surgical management of these patients, and meticulous and personalized preoperative planning would be of paramount importance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Strategies to avoid internal carotid artery injury in "sandwich" atlantoaxial dislocation patients during surgery.

PURPOSE: To elucidate the anatomic relationship between the internal carotid artery (ICA) and the bony structures of the craniovertebral junction among "sandwich" atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) patients, and to analyze the risks of injury during surgical procedures. METHODS: The distance from the medial wall of ICA to the midsagittal plane (D1), the shortest distance between the ICA wall and the anterior cortex of the lateral mass of atlas (LMA) (D2) on the most caudal and cranial levels of LMA and the angle (A) between the sagittal plane passing through the screw entry point of C1 lateral mass(C1LM) screw and the medial tangent line of the vessel passing through the entry point were measured. Besides, the location of ICA in front of the atlantoaxial vertebra was divided into 4 categories (Z1-Z4). RESULTS: There was a statistically difference between the male and female patients regarding D1, and the difference between D2 at level a and level b as well as angle A between the left and right sides were statistically different (p < 0.05). Ninety-two ICAs (57.5%) were anteriorly located in Z3, 50 (31.3%) were located in Z4, 17 were located in Z2, and only one ICA was located in Z1 in all 80 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In "sandwich" AAD patients, particular attention should be paid to excessively medialized ICA to avoid ICA injury during trans-oral procedures, and the risk of injuring the ICA with more cranially and medially angulated C1LM screw placement was relatively less during posterior fixation procedures. A novel classification of ICA location was used to describe the relationship between ICA and LMA.

Vertebral Artery Variations at the Craniovertebral Junction in "Sandwich" Atlantoaxial Dislocation Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the vertebral artery (VA) pattern of 96 "sandwich" atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) patients and to describe the strategies of reducing the injury of VA during surgery. METHODS: From 2009 to 2020, we retrospectively reviewed the 3-dimensional computed tomography angiography data of 96 AAD patients combined with atlas occipitalization and C2-3 fusion, which were diagnosed as "sandwich" AAD and 96 patients as control group patients who were without atlas occipitalization, C2-3 fusion and any other cervical bone deformity at our institution. The variations of each side of VA were described in 3 different parts (C0-1, C1-2, and C2-3) according to the characteristics of the 3-part pathological structures in "sandwich" subgroup. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two sides of VAs in every group of patients were analyzed and every VA was described separately at 3 different level regions. There were different variations in these 3 different regions: 4 variations in the upper fusion region, 5 variations in the sandwiched region, and 6 variations in the lower fusion region in sandwich AAD patients. And the rate of VA deformity in sandwich AAD patients was much higher and more types of VA variations existed. CONCLUSION: In "sandwich" AAD patients, deformities of vertebral arteries in craniovertebral junction are more common, and the same VA may have deformities at different levels that severely affect surgical procedures. Therefore, preoperative imaging examination of VA for "sandwich" AAD patients is vital of guiding surgeons to avoid injury of VA during surgery.